Blog

The Hidden Gap Between Confidence and Accuracy in Decision-Making

As leaders, we like to believe that our confidence in decision-making correlates with the quality of our choices. After all, experience, intuition, and expertise should guide us toward the right path—shouldn’t they? Yet, new research published in Nature suggests that confidence does not always equate to correctness. This has profound implications for business leaders who must navigate complexity, ambiguity, and high-stakes decisions every day.

Key Findings from the Research

The study, Estimating self-performance when making complex decisions, explores how individuals assess their own performance in decision-making. Researchers found that people rely on internal confidence levels rather than objective performance metrics when evaluating how well they have made decisions. However, confidence can fluctuate and be influenced by factors unrelated to actual performance, such as past successes, emotional states, and cognitive biases.

The key takeaway? Even experienced decision-makers can overestimate their ability to make good choices. This has serious implications for business leadership, where misplaced confidence can lead to flawed strategic initiatives, missed opportunities, and costly mistakes.

Why This Matters for Business Leaders

Understanding this research is crucial because leaders are responsible for guiding teams, allocating resources, and shaping the strategic direction of their organizations. If you don’t critically evaluate your decision-making processes, you may unknowingly fall into traps that could undermine your success.

Here’s what you can do about it.

Actionable Strategies for Leaders: How to Improve Decision-Making

Consider implementing the following strategies to mitigate the risk of overconfidence and ensure your team makes better decisions. Each is aligned with Enabling Empowerment’s 7-Step Decision-Making Framework, which provides a structured approach.

1. Create a Culture of Decision Reviews (Step 7: Show Your Work)

One of the most effective ways to combat overconfidence is to review past decisions systematically. Implement structured decision reviews where leaders and teams evaluate:

• The rationale behind key decisions
• Whether the expected outcomes were achieved
• What unexpected variables influenced the results

How to implement:

• Schedule post-mortems for major strategic decisions.
• Encourage teams to document key assumptions and revisit them later.
• Use a ‘pre-mortem’ approach to anticipate potential failures before finalizing a decision.

2. Encourage Diverse Perspectives (Step 2: Develop a Range of Creative Alternatives)

Leaders who surround themselves with ‘yes-men’ are more likely to suffer from decision-making blind spots. The study suggests that our confidence often comes from internal factors rather than objective truth. One way to counteract this is to actively seek out dissenting opinions and alternative viewpoints.

How to implement:

• Assign a ‘red team’ to challenge assumptions before finalizing high-stakes decisions.
• Use structured brainstorming techniques where team members write down ideas before discussing them to prevent early anchoring.
• Invite external advisors or frontline employees to contribute insights that may challenge conventional thinking.

3. Apply Data-Driven Decision-Making (Step 6: Perform Economic Analysis)

The study highlights that confidence does not always reflect reality. Leaders should rely on quantifiable data rather than gut instinct when making decisions. This doesn’t mean intuition has no place, but data should be used to validate assumptions.

How to implement:

• Require teams to provide data-backed justifications for recommendations.
• Use scenario analysis to assess potential risks and benefits.
• Track key performance indicators (KPIs) that measure decision outcomes over time.

4. Acknowledge and Manage Decision-Making Biases (Step 4: Manage Risk and Upside)

The research underscores that confidence can be influenced by cognitive biases. Overconfidence bias, confirmation bias, and anchoring are common culprits that distort judgment.

How to implement:

• Train leaders on common decision traps (see The Hidden Traps Sabotaging Your Decisions for a deep dive into this topic).
• Use structured checklists to force teams to consider alternative explanations.
• Adopt a practice of devil’s advocacy where someone is assigned to challenge group consensus.

5. Document and Communicate Decision Rationale (Step 7: Show Your Work)

When decisions are made, the reasoning behind them often fades over time. Without documentation, teams cannot learn from past mistakes—or successes.

How to implement:

• Require decision-makers to write down their reasoning for major strategic choices.
• Use a ‘decision log’ to track key choices, expected outcomes, and actual results.
• Encourage transparency in leadership discussions so teams can learn from prior experiences.

---

Final Thoughts: The Best Leaders Are Self-Aware Decision-Makers

This new research reinforces a truth that many great leaders have already realized: Self-awareness in decision-making is just as important as expertise. The best leaders recognize their own cognitive biases and put mechanisms in place to ensure they are making the best possible choices—not just the ones they feel most confident about.

If you’re serious about improving your decision-making and helping your team avoid costly missteps, download The Hidden Traps Sabotaging Your Decisions to explore the most common decision traps and how to avoid them.

Download Here

By refining your approach to decision-making, you can lead with confidence—without falling into the overconfidence trap.

---

For further insights into decision-making frameworks and avoiding common decision traps, check out our other blog articles and subscribe to our newsletter.

If you’re interested in more practical strategies for overcoming decision traps, check out my book Enabling Empowerment, where I go deeper into these concepts.  It is also available in audiobook format on Audible.

Don’t have time to read the book?  Check out this 22-minute pre-recorded webinar on Spotting and Sidestepping Decision Traps.

Still not enough time?!?  Ok….here is an awesome interview by Jon Franko of the Manufacturing Employer Podcast that you can listen to in your car!

---

Chris Seifert is the author of Enabling Empowerment: A Leadership Playbook for Ending Micromanagement and Empowering Decision-Makers. With over two decades of experience in transforming organizations through strategic leadership and decision-making frameworks, Chris has helped teams cut through bottlenecks, optimize capital project budgets, and build cultures of accountability. He is passionate about teaching leaders how to empower their teams to make smarter, faster decisions without sacrificing business value.